Again, as often happens, the restoration projects expanded once Waterman started to survey the house and was able deduce ideas about the original structure that were hidden over the years. The home had received numerous additions over its life, Waterman said. It grew from roughly 3000 square feet to roughly 6000 square feet, including a major renovation in the 1980s or 1990s. But, he added, those remodel decisions didn’t account for the original design and left the home bland—they left this 1920s gem feeling “like a house from the 80s or 90s,” he said, with “only the exterior to tell the home’s original story.” So, they turned their attention to restoring those period details in the foyer and the living room. Hand hewn beams in the ceilings were stripped of paint and refinished to highlight their handmade nature reminiscent of centuries-old English building technique.
Multiple projects in the foyer—new wood flooring, restored ironwork and tile on the staircase and a mural—reintroduced a Tudor aesthetic original to the home. Additionally, spaces in the dining room and turret that had been covered during earlier remodeling were reopened. Waterman said additions to homes are often bad decisions made by people looking to add square footage without considering how spaces interact with each other, the scale of a room and its features or the original intent of the architect. Often, he added, the new square footage doesn’t end up working the way a homeowner expects, either. The work done to this house before the current homeowners began their restoration project was a perfect example, Waterman said. “It was a grand house. Many of the original additions were not thought through,” he said.
Waterman suggests a guiding principle for homeowners looking to expand square footage. If you’re going to add on to your home ask yourself one question:
“How do you make the house feel it was always built this way?”